Automated enforcement mechanisms, such as red-light and speed cameras, are widely presented as tools for enhancing public safety. However, growing evidence suggests that these systems are often deployed with revenue generation as a primary objective, rather than the stated aim of reducing accidents or improving road safety. This has sparked legal and ethical concerns, as communities and citizens face the financial burden of fines without seeing corresponding improvements in public safety.
200BradyStreet positions itself as an advocate for transparency and fairness, unearthing the real intent behind the deployment of these systems. Through our platform’s data collection and analysis, we can help expose patterns that demonstrate how municipalities are using these systems more for profit than safety.

By tapping into this undercurrent of concern, 200BradyStreet is not only committed to uncovering the truth, but also providing a path to legal recovery for citizens who have been unjustly fined.

Automated Enforcement: A Guise of Public Safety or Revenue Generation?